Monday, 17 February 2014

Showcase

Regular readers will recall a series of posts on Gimme LEGO at the end of last year describing the design and construction of my Ghostbusters MOC; anyone wanting to check out the postings can find them here, here and here, and you can see a picture of the finished models below.


During the planning phase, I made the decision to design the MOC so that it'd fit into the Showcase cabinets that LEGO brand stores make available to members of LUGs to display their creations. This necessitated a number of design compromises, not least the need to make the Ghostbusters firehouse narrower and shorter than I otherwise would have liked, but I felt that I should still be able to come up with a design that I was reasonably happy with.

Once the build was underway, I got in touch with Gary Davis (Bricks for Brains), fellow member of the Brickish Association and Showcase coordinator for my local LEGO brand retail store. He confirmed that provided the model came out OK and met LEGO's guidelines for inclusion in the Showcase, he'd be willing to add it to the queue for installation in the store. Thankfully Gary was satisfied when I showed him pictures of the finished MOC a couple of months later, and so it was that a couple of weeks ago I carefully packed everything up and took it along to the Watford LEGO brand store where we installed it in the Showcase cabinet.


The Showcase cabinets are unfortunately not very deep, so in order to squeeze the HQ building into the available space it had to be positioned almost completely sideways on. This in turn meant that there wasn't much room left to accommodate the Ghostbusters minifigures or the ECTO-1 Cadillac, particularly once the obligatory information cards had been put into position. Even so, as you can see from the pictures above and below (click to enlarge) the final arrangement turned out OK and it was reassuring to get some positive feedback from staff and a few early morning customers as we finalised the display.


Showcase MOCs are generally only on display for a month or so before they're replaced by something else, so if you want to check out my Ghostbusters display before it's rotated out then try and get along to the Watford LEGO store by the end of February.

While I'm on the subject of Ghostbusters, most readers will probably be aware that LEGO will themselves be releasing a Ghostbusters set later this year after Brent Waller's Ghostbusters 30th Anniversary design achieved 10,000 votes on Cuusoo and subsequently got the thumbs up from the LEGO review board. Details of the set have just emerged at the New York Toy Fair - Set 21108 LEGO Ghostbusters will be available for purchase in June 2014 for US $49.99; I haven't seen details on a UK price yet. The set will include ECTO-1 and the four ghostbusters, and you can see a couple of images of the upcoming set below (click to enlarge).


While it's a shame that the set won't include a Ghostbusters HQ building or Slimer, the absence of the HQ building at least is understandable on the basis of cost. I have to admit that I wasn't a huge fan of the Cuusoo Back to the Future DeLorean, but my first impressions of the Ghostbusters set are much, much more positive. Honestly, I think ECTO-1 and the minifigures look great, and even though I already have my own versions of them, the set will still be a must-buy for me. You can read more about the upcoming set on the Cuusoo Blog.


< -- Ghostbusters Minifigs

Monday, 3 February 2014

Crosstown Traffic

Having spent the last couple of months writing about MOCs and handing out awards, not to mention reviewing a couple of the new LEGO Movie sets over at Brickset, I was itching to build something old, and I knew just the set....


About a year and a half ago I was idly eBrowsing and I stumbled across a used example of the set above, Set 355 Town Center Set with Roadways. It was being sold complete with box, instructions and even some left-over stickers, and I was very tempted. Fully expecting the item to sell for more than I was willing to pay I nevertheless placed a speculative bid, more in hope than expectation, and against the odds I won the auction. A few days later the set arrived.


The box, as you can see above (click picture to enlarge), is far from perfect but it's still very much intact. The front of the lift-up cover shows the contents of the set against a neutral background, and that's pretty much it, apart from the classic "Legoland" branding and the LEGO Logo of the time in the bottom right-hand corner. The back of the box (below) features a number of panels which highlight a few aspects of the set, as well as showing a couple of rather serious-looking kids building and playing with the models; the right side shows a portion of the cardboard base, which we'll get on to shortly.


Lifting the lid is a joy; within the box is a polystyrene/styrofoam inner tray which snugly houses three smaller removable cardboard boxes. The largest of these boxes contains the parts for the garage, the medium sized box contains the parts for the crane, chalet, flatbed truck and white sports car, and the smallest contains the parts for the digger and tipper truck. The two largest boxes have a plastic-lined window in the front so you can see the parts within. You can see the arrangement of boxes in the picture below; by this point I had removed the parts from each of the boxes in preparation for building.


All the models are designed to be accommodated on a cardboard baseplate around 50 cm square which you can see in the picture below. The base folds in half and slides inside the lid of the set box for storage - if you look closely you can see it peeking through the cut-away on the inside of the box lid on either side of the little boy's face in the picture above. Overall it's a beautifully packaged set, and I was delighted to find the inner packaging in such great shape.


The set is supplied with just one instruction booklet, and at just 16 pages long and less than 14 cm square the booklet offers a masterclass in brevity and efficiency; the largest model in the set, the garage, is disposed of in just 9 building steps split over 4 pages. At first glance the cover of the booklet looks a bit of a mess; it's only when you fully open out the booklet and view the front and back covers together (picture below) that you get the full picture.


You can see a sample page of the instruction booklet below showing all of the completed models in situ on the cardboard baseplate; obsessives may have spotted that some of the vehicles and road signs are in different positions in the picture below compared with their positions in the image on the front of the box. Life's probably too short to worry about such things, however, so you're probably better off not having noticed it....


The set comes supplied with two sticker sheets, and incredibly they were both present and almost mint in the copy of the set that I purchased. LEGO generously supplied stickers representing eleven different nations to stick on the flag pole, and if none of those was suitable then you had a more generic LEGO flag that you could use. Evidently the person that originally owned my copy of the set was a Brit and thus used the Union Jack stickers, but all the other stickers were left alone, and more than 40 years later they still look pristine and ready to use.



I would have built this set shortly after receiving it were it not for the fact that when I checked the contents against the online inventory at Bricklink I discovered that almost 30 out of the set's intended 332 parts were missing. Many of the missing parts were older variants of common parts, e.g. 2 x 4 bricks without cross-supports, 1 x 1 round bricks with solid studs (as opposed to hollow studs) and 2 x 2 tiles without grooves at the base. While these older variants are in many cases not functionally different to their modern counterparts, having chanced upon an antique set which was in many respects in decent condition, I figured that I should try and do it justice by sourcing the correct older variants of the missing parts rather than substituting them with modern equivalents. Interestingly, the older variants can often be sourced fairly easily via Bricklink, and they don't always command higher prices than their modern counterparts; I gradually sourced them over time, finally completing the job of replacing all the missing parts fairly recently.


Those elements that weren't missing were, I must say, in absolutely magnificent condition for their age - the trans clear parts weren't discoloured, printed parts weren't faded, and everything looked nearly new which is pretty astonishing after more than 40 years. You can see a photograph of some of the more interesting elements above. While not all of them are rare, many of them are long-retired and should trigger a pleasing trip down memory lane for some older readers ! The set contains two of the black 1 x 4 bricks with white Legoland logo pattern; these appeared in only 5 sets in total, the most recent of which was released in 1973. The set also contains red and yellow versions of the Legoland brick. The old-style 4 x 4 turntables (black variant shown above) were phased out in 1976, while the red 1 x 2 brick with SHELL logo only ever appeared in 4 sets, between 1966 and 1972. Trans clear 2 x 4 bricks haven't been available for years; the one in the picture above is an old-style 2 x 4 brick without cross supports, which was pretty common in the 70's. I had (and still have) quite a few of them, although they've all become discoloured to a lesser or greater extent over the years, unlike the example in the picture which is in really good condition. The antennae were notorious for losing their side spokes, so it's nice to see an intact example. The set also contains white, blue and red 1 x 4 bricks with a car grille pattern. The pattern is actually embossed rather than printed, and is embossed in silver on the blue and red bricks and in black on the white brick. This version of the white 1 x 8 brick with 'GARAGE' printed on it only ever appeared in 3 sets, while the yellow 2 x 2 brick printed with the old-style LEGO logo appeared in 4 sets. My one minor disappointment is that this set originally included either a large pine tree or a more interesting (and much rarer) granulated bush with 3 trunks, and my example unfortunately contains the large pine. Finally, you can see the 'missing' Union Jack flag from the sticker sheet neatly applied to the flag pole



A couple of the baseplates (pictures above) included in the set are also worth a mention. The larger of the two, which measures 24 x 32 studs, is predictably unique to the set. It features rounded corners and three studless, textured driveways each of which covers an area of 4 x 20 studs. Some of the studs have white printing on top to help the builder quickly identify where to place the first layer of elements. Given the general lack of hand-holding inherent in older sets compared with more modern builds, it seems strange that LEGO used to print baseplates in this way. The smaller baseplate shown above, which measures 14 x 20 studs, also features stud printing and is once again unique to this set. It lacks the exaggerated rounded corners shown in the instruction booklet and the images on the box, and according to Bricklink it's a known variant in this set.

The build itself was fairly straightforward, with the garage first up for construction. One thing I immediately noticed when I started to build was that the clutch on the bricks was significantly greater than I'm used to, making the elements harder to push together, and also harder to take apart; I'm pretty sure that this is just down to the age of the bricks. The red 1 x 2 bricks with SHELL logo mentioned earlier are utilised in the construction of a couple of petrol pumps, and you can see the large pine tree behind the petrol pumps looking ugly (did I mention that I would have preferred the granulated bush with 3 trunks instead....?!). The two blue doors at the front of the garage do open, but there's no interior detail within the building.



Next up is the crane, which utilises the black 1 x 4 Legoland-embossed bricks described earlier. This structure also incorporates the aforementioned 4 x 4 turntable plus an old-style winch with metal handle to provide some play features. The winch contains a reel, around which string is wound; a metal handle attached to the reel can be rotated to wind/unwind the string and thus lift/lower the load at the end of the string. This kind of winch arrangement was very common in the sets of my youth, and as a kid I spent countless hours trying to securely tie one end of the string to the reel while threading the other end (which was almost invariably frayed) through the tiny hole in the hook to attach it. Happy days....



The final structure is the chalet. This incorporates a number of old-style windows and doors, as well as the previously highlighted antenna with spokes. The red windows with shutters at the front of the house are rarer than I thought, having only ever appeared in 5 sets according to Bricklink. I never owned any of those 5 sets as a child, but I nevertheless have a bunch of red windows with shutters in my childhood LEGO collection, so it's a genuine mystery where they came from. The 33 degree slope bricks used for the roof are commonplace now but their first ever appearance in sets was in 1971 so they must have seemed deliciously new and exotic back in 1972 when this set was released.



The set comes with four vehicles, all of them elegant in their simplicity IMHO and a reminder of how straightforward LEGO vehicles were in my youth. The tipper truck (below) was assembled first, with its immaculate silver embossed engine grille and Legoland branding on the working tipper bed. You can see the lack of a groove at the base of the black 2 x 2 tiles as mentioned previously; given the increased clutch I'm not looking forward to trying to remove those tiles at a later date without damaging them....


The digger (below) features a few of the retired elements that I touched on earlier, including the black 1 x 1 round brick with a solid stud (the studs are hollow these days) and the yellow 2 x 2 brick printed with an old-style LEGO logo. There are a few other vintage elements used here as well - the bucket and bucket arm, the wheels and the wheel holders are all long-since retired.


The sports car is pretty unremarkable, although it's nice to see the white embossed 1 x 4 brick with engine grille in such spritely condition, and the same goes for the windscreen which you'd normally expect to have discoloured to some extent after all these years.


Lastly, there's a flatbed truck (below). Although the design is pretty basic, it does feature a couple of blue 45 degree 2 x 2 double concave slopes at the front which are fairly uncommon, not to mention a(nother) immaculate 1 x 4 brick with embossed engine grille. The six black round 1 x 1 bricks with solid stud on the back act as a guide to hold the cargo in place once it's been dropped in place by the crane.


With all the buildings and vehicles assembled, all that was left for me to do was to drop the buildings into their allocated spaces on the cardboard baseplate, place the vehicles into suitable positions, add the selection of roadsigns provided with the set, and we're done. I don't know about the rest of you oldies out there, but even my picture below (click to enlarge) of the completed set with everything in place gives me a warm, nostalgic feeling inside, let alone the actual model itself which is currently occupying my dining room table and which I can't bear to move. I suppose that by today's standards it could reasonably be argued that all the models are simplistic and lacking in detail, but if I'd owned this set as a kid I would have been ecstatic, and even now I think that it all comes together beautifully.


To coin a well worn cliche, they don't make 'em like they used to.... We've had a bunch of "Town Plan"-type sets over the years, most recently 2013's Set 60026 Town Square, but it's been a while since the often-substantial collection of buildings, vehicles and (more recently) minifigures which make up these sets has been pulled together into a cohesive whole by the use of one or more large baseplates; honestly, I think there are a number of recent sets that would substantially benefit from this treatment.


Set 355 Town Center Set with Roadways was released in 1972 and contains either 332 or 336 parts depending on whether you're more inclined to trust Bricklink or Brickset. As stated previously, I found my copy of the set on eBay, although that was the only time I've ever seen the set for sale there and there don't currently appear to be any copies for sale on either ebay.co.uk or ebay.com. If you're looking to buy, Bricklink is probably your best bet; at the time of writing there are 16 copies of the set on sale there in various states of repair and completeness. A new, sealed copy will set you back almost £300 plus shipping, while a used, boxed and complete example will cost about half as much, and if you're not fussed about the box then you're looking at considerably less.

Monday, 20 January 2014

"And the Gimme LEGO Readers' Choice Award for Best Set of 2013 goes to...."

.....Set 10236 Ewok Village !


Man, that was close - I guessed that there probably wouldn't be a runaway winner this time round, but never dreamed how tight voting would turn out to be. The competition developed into a two-horse race from early on, with Set 10236 Ewok Village slugging it out with Set 10237 Tower of Orthanc for the lead and everything else left behind eating their dust. In the end it was the Ewok Village which prevailed by 16 votes, but only after a hell of a fight. Voting was open for 10 days, and until the final day the Tower of Orthanc was in pole position. With about 12 hours to go the two sets were literally neck and neck having polled exactly the same number of votes, and the lead then swapped between the two sets on multiple occasions until the last hour or so when the Ewok Village finally got its nose in front and held on to the lead, finally pipping Orthanc to the post. Competition was fueled by a couple of front page postings on Brickset by Huw (most recently here) together with some decent banter in the comments which followed.


Final standings are shown below. Both the Ewok Village and the Tower of Orthanc polled around a third of the total votes each, leaving the rest of the nominees to squabble over the remaining third of the votes between them. My non-licenced set of the year, Set 10232 Palace Cinema, came a respectable third in the rankings but only actually got 8% of the vote, and everything else got less than 5%. I was pleased to see Set 70500 Kai's Fire Mech and Set 70709 Galactic Titan get a few votes each - both are relatively unheralded sets which I really liked and can highly recommend. Most people who voted seemed content with the choice of sets on offer, with only 20 votes (less than 2% of the total) nominating an alternative; there were a couple of impassioned arguments for Set 10234 Sydney Opera House, and a few others such as Set 21103 DeLorean Time Machine and Set 70008 Gorzan's Gorilla Striker got a mention, but none attracted enough support to gatecrash the party.
Thanks in no small part to the generous publicity provided by Brickset, well over 1,000 people voted this time. That's a very respectable turnout IMHO, and in fact the total of 1,076 votes placed was almost double the number placed in last year's readers' poll. Despite the decent turnout, however, it's worth noting that only around 14% of visitors to Gimme LEGO during the period that the poll was live actually voted; that's an increased percentage compared to last year, but still a modest proportion of visitors to the site.


As well as taking home the Gimme LEGO Readers' award, the Ewok Village was also the winner of the Best Licenced Set award in the 2013 Gimme LEGO Awards, and if you need a gushing reminder of why it's such a great set then check out my awards posting here where I wax lyrical about it.... The designer of the set was LEGO employee Marcos Bessa, and you can see him talking about his wonderful creation in the video clip below; if the clip isn't showing on your device then you can check out the video on YouTube by clicking here. Congratulations for designing the winning set, Marcos, and thanks !


So farewell to 2013, then, and welcome to 2014. The year has already started with a bang, not least thanks to the imperious Set 10243 Parisian Restaurant, and I can't wait to see what else LEGO have in store for us....

Thanks for reading, and sincere thanks also to those who took the time to vote in the Readers' Award poll.

Monday, 6 January 2014

The Gimme LEGO Awards 2013

Yes, yes - I know the 2013 awards are a bit late; I would normally have hoped to have published them before now, but the series of postings about my Ghostbusters MOCs pushed this post back a couple of weeks. Anyway, better late than never, I'm delighted to present my annual Gimme LEGO Awards for the best and worst of the LEGO year just gone. All entirely subjective and unscientific, of course, so please feel free to leave a comment if you violently disagree (or indeed agree...) with any of my selections.


1. Best theme

Last year's winner : Monster Fighters

2013 winner : Creator, including Creator Expert

LEGO themes come and go, but Creator is eternal. Well, since 2001 at least. For me, LEGO's Creator theme is the eternal bridesmaid, inevitably in the shadow of the latest glitzy licensed offering, and with a correspondingly modest marketing budget to boot. Even the Creator theme art, taken from LEGO's S@H website, is a bit plain. But the thing is, the Creator theme consistently delivers - as I previously noted here and here, the Creator theme invariably features a number of sets every year that I really want to get. Think of it as the quirky girl in the movie who's best friends with the hero, but he's only got eyes for the cheerleader; eventually the penny drops, the cheerleader is revealed to be not all that, and the hero finally realises that his true love has been staring him in the face from the beginning. Well, that's Creator I reckon....



An obvious attraction of the basic sets in the theme is their longevity and value for money - effectively three sets in one, and yet retailing at a relatively low price point compared with sets of a comparable size within other themes. The lack of specialized elements in the sets also arguably makes them particularly useful as parts packs for building your own creations. What the sets don't generally get much credit for is the actual designs, though - the inexpensive Fierce Flyer set above immediately caught my eye when I first spied the 2013 Creator line up - a nice primary model, and the alternate builds aren't bad either. I'm also a fan of Set 31011 Aviation Adventures (below), although IMHO there actually isn't a bad set in the 2013 Creator line up.


The icing on the cake in 2013 was the addition of some of LEGO's biggest and most complex models to the Creator theme under the banner of Creator Expert; now in addition to the virtues extolled above, Creator is also the home of LEGO's beloved modular buildings, such as Set 10232 Palace Cinema (below) and a number of other gems such as Set 10233 Horizon Express, Set 10235 Winter Village Market and Set 10234 Sydney Opera House. Add to that the arrival of LEGO's latest and possibly greatest modular building, the Parisian Restaurant, on the 1st January 2014, and it looks like Creator might be difficult to shift from the top spot next year as well.


Honourable mention : The Lone Ranger - The Lone Ranger film might have bombed at the box office, but that's in no way a reflection of LEGO's efforts with their Lone Ranger theme. I wasn't expecting much when the sets were announced, most likely just a sprinkling of by-the-numbers sets for what would most likely be a one-and-done theme, but I admit I was badly mistaken. Six retail sets, all of them decent, and a couple - Set 79108 Stagecoach Escape  and Set 79111 Constitution Train Chase - were frankly excellent. It wasn't just the set design either - some of the minifigures were outstanding. Well done to LEGO, then, who more than kept up their part of the bargain, even if the movie was a disappointment.

Honourable mention #2 : Galaxy Squad - The latest in a long line of non-licensed LEGO space themes, Galaxy Squad picked up the baton from previous favourite Alien Conquest in offering some great-looking sci-fi themed models which were literally packed with clever design touches and neat play features. The alien species was a particular highlight of the theme for me. I strongly suspect that sales were handicapped by a lack of marketing push, however, which makes me nervous that one of these days LEGO won't bother with an unlicensed space theme.


2. Most Disappointing Theme

Last year's 'winner' : Cars

2013 'winner' : Superheroes


If in January 2013 you'd told me that I'd be hanging the gong for most disappointing theme of 2013 around the neck of the DC and Marvel Superheroes themes then I'd probably have laughed in your face. Back then I'd just reviewed Set 10937 Arkham Asylum Breakout over at Brickset and given it a ringing endorsement. To say that what's been released since doesn't maintain those high standards is a massive understatement, however. For me, it's provided a perfect example of everything that's wrong with licensed themes, namely weak, lazy models which feel like they're only there to provide an excuse for LEGO to release a bunch of themed minifigures. Yes, I get it that minifigures are big business, but according to LEGO's own senior management the company's mission is to "Inspire and Develop the Builders of Tomorrow", and I'd wager that it's unlikely to do that by bundling a bunch of minifigures with mediocre models and charging a premium for the privilege. Very disappointing.

(Dis)honourable mention : Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. Another theme where the actual sets seemed to come a distant second to the minifigures in terms of priorities. When the license was announced, a generation of TMNT fans cheered, and who could resist those minifigures ? Once the elation had died down, however, I for one was left scratching my head at the actual sets. One of them, Set 79104 The Shellraiser Street Chase, supposedly even had to be temporarily withdrawn as it kept falling apart, and most of them just looked like an incoherent afterthought. Let's hope that the next wave of sets is an improvement on the last....


3. The "Medieval Market Village" award for Best Non-Licensed Set

Last year's winner : Set 10228 Haunted House

2013 winner : Set 10232 Palace Cinema


While I don't think there were any non-licensed sets in 2013 to rival the splendour of last year's wonderful winner (the Monster Fighters Haunted House) there were certainly a number of worthy contenders for the 2013 award. After much thought (not to mention some serious pressure from my other half, for whom there was absolutely no doubt what the winner should be) Set 10232 Palace Cinema got the nod.


As a member of an extremely exclusive club, namely LEGO's beloved series of modular buildings, the Palace Cinema had a lot to live up to, and in most respects it didn't disappoint. It was the attention to detail which immediately won me over - the humorous film posters adorning the outer walls, the interior details such as the concession stand and screening room, the limo complete with movie star and paparazzo, and the terracotta-style roof tiles for starters. I'm also a big fan of the quirky stylings of the building itself which obviously brings to mind the world famous Chinese Theatre in Hollywood, location of many a world premiere. As you'd expect from a modular, the set is full of clever little touches, not to mention a myriad of interesting elements.


If I have a criticism of the set, it's perhaps that it feels a little insubstantial against some of the other recent modulars, for instance Set 10224 Town Hall, but for me at least that's more than compensated for by the overall quality of the set. In the final analysis, my immediate reaction when I first saw the advance publicity photos was one of excitement, and I wasn't disappointed when the set eventually arrived - a worthy winner IMHO.


Honourable Mention : Set 10233 Horizon Express. I thought I'd died and gone to heaven when LEGO released Set 10194 Emerald Night in 2009, and I wasn't alone; it was a cause for genuine sadness when the set was retired at the end of 2011. LEGO then gave us Set 10219 Maersk Train, an interesting, authentic but ultimately workmanlike offering, to supplement the less realistic City trains which were also available at the time. When the Maersk Train departed in late 2012 I kept my fingers tightly crossed that LEGO would quickly replace it with another adult-oriented train, and my prayers were thankfully answered when the Horizon Express was released at the beginning of 2013. OK, so it doesn't necessarily take your breath away like Emerald Night did, but it's still a cracker. A TGV by any other name, it looks great, and it's packed with neat details, starting with the black and white brick-built logo on the side of the locomotive. LEGO kept the cost down by not including the elements needed to motorise it, but it's easy to remedy this should you decide to do so. In summary, it looks great, it's an interesting build, and it's decent value for money - it only missed out on top spot by a whisker.





Other contenders : Set 70709 Galactic Titan, Set 70500 Kai's Fire Mech, Set 60026 Town Square, Set 41015 Dolphin Cruiser, Set 10234 Sydney Opera House


4. Best Licensed Set

Last year's winner : Set 79003 An Unexpected Gathering

2013 winner : Set 10236 Ewok Village

In contrast to the award for best non-licensed set I was spoiled for choice this year in this category - we've had some absolutely stunning licensed sets to choose from - but for me the Ewok Village stands above all the rest, both literally and metaphorically.


Sometimes it seems that I spend half my time moaning about LEGO's Star Wars theme on the pages of Gimme LEGO. As a huge Star Wars fan who was dragged out of my LEGO Dark Ages by the release of Set 10188 Death Star, I've watched with dismay as the Star Wars cash cow has been milked by way of a profusion of lazy remakes and unimaginative designs. It's therefore fair to say that I was absolutely amazed when I first spied the Ewok Village.


First and foremost, I think it was an astonishingly brave decision by LEGO to release it at all - a huge, expensive set which is effectively just a couple of big trees embellished with a bunch of minifigures sounds absolutely crazy, to be honest. Questions about how well it's performed at retail aside, the designer has I think done a beautiful job with the set. Once again it's the myriad of little details that delights - similar to the aforementioned Death Star play set, multiple familiar little vignettes play out across the model; Han roasting over an open fire (above), logs ready and waiting to crush a passing AT-ST (below), Threepio being carried aloft by the Ewoks, and many more - they're all there for fans to enjoy.


I've at times been highly critical of LEGO's tendency to prioritise minifigures over the actual set designs, and nowhere has this been more in evidence over the past few years than in the Star Wars theme. I can however happily live with the inclusion of seventeen minifigures in this set given the quality of the set that they accompany. The minifigures themselves are predictably impressive - the outstanding quality of recent Star Wars minifigures is certainly not in doubt - but in this case they enhance the set rather than provide a substitute for it.


As an offering to fans of the Star Wars Original Trilogy, the Ewok Village is a wonderful and timely reminder that LEGO is still willing to take commercial risks in order to give their fans incredible products, and for that I'm genuinely thankful. A superb set.

Honourable Mention : Set 10237 Tower of Orthanc. 


Having delighted Lord of the Rings (LotR) fans by securing the licence, I think it's fair to say that LEGO have in the main done justice to the theme with some excellent sets; lest we forget, the LotR theme won the "Better than Expected" award in last year's Gimme LEGO Awards. So how have LEGO followed that up in 2013 ? By releasing a second wave of great sets, that's how. While many of The Hobbit sets have left me a bit cold, I have no such reservations about the 2013 LotR offerings, the pinnacle of which is the amazing Tower of Orthanc. I have to admit I never saw it coming - 2359 pieces puts the set firmly in UCS territory size-wise, and indeed the level of detail in the model wouldn't disgrace a UCS set either. Like the Ewok Village I think this was a brave release - that's a big old lump of black for the average LEGO fan to digest - but for fans of LotR like myself it's wonderful. It's not just a pretty face, either - look behind the detailed, imposing facade and a multitude of different rooms are revealed, each with its own nod to the subject material. Any other year this excellent set might well have finished top of the pile, it's that good.




Other contenders : Set 10937 Arkham Asylum Breakout, Set 79108 Stagecoach Escape, Set 79111 Constitution Train Chase, Set 10240 Red Five X-wing Starfighter, Set 79008 Pirate Ship Ambush


5. The "Phantom Menace" Award for Most Disappointing Set

Last year's winner : Set 21012 Sydney Opera House

2013 winner : Set 76008 Iron Man vs. The Mandarin: Ultimate Showdown 


Set 76008 Iron Man vs. The Mandarin: Ultimate Showdown

Regardless of what the Iron Man 3 branding on the front of the box might suggest, to say that this set is only loosely based on the Iron Man 3 movie would be a gross understatement. Yes, it features minifigs of Iron Man and the Mandarin, but the build itself bears no relation to the movie at all, consisting of a random vehicle vaguely resembling an armoured car with a flamethrower bolted on to the roof. It looks like something that a 6 year old could (and probably would) have designed, and even aside from the complete lack of relevance to the subject matter it's a piss poor model in its own right. Some will argue that LEGO sometimes have to design these licensed sets before all the details of the film are known, but frankly that's not our problem as consumers; it'd surely be better just to pull these mediocre tie-ins from the release schedule when it becomes clear that they're irrelevant, particularly when they're so awful....

(Dis)honourable mention : Set 76006 Iron Man: Extremis Sea Port Battle. The second of a Superheroes dismal double-whammy in this category, the Extremis Sea Port Battle comes a close second to its ghastly brethren above. Once again the model bears no relation to the movie, and once again the design is weak, albeit not quite as risible as the vehicle in Set 76008. The set also features a more interesting selection of minifigures, so overall it's slightly less rubbish than Set 76008. Slightly.

(Dis)honourable mention 2 : Mr Gold. I'm sure you all know the story by now: following the launch of the Collectible Minifigures in 2010, huge numbers of LEGO fans around the globe strove to accumulate a complete collection. By early 2013, LEGO had released nine series of Collectible Minifigures, each consisting of sixteen different minifigs, plus a further set of nine Team GB minifigures, all of which collectors avidly snapped up. That's 153 different minifigures in total. And then later in 2013, LEGO decided to include an ultra-rare 'Mr. Gold' chase figure in Series 10 of the Collectible Minifigures, thus consigning huge numbers of completists to either hand over a genuine king's ransom to gleeful eBay scalpers, or else just accept that the collection they'd lovingly cultivated over the previous three years would never again be complete. Thanks a bunch, LEGO.


6. Best Minifigure

Last year's winner : Queen Amidala

2013 winner : Tonto


Just prior to the retail release of the Lone Ranger sets I was lucky enough to get an early peek at Set 79108 Stagecoach Escape and I was blown away by the quality of some of the minifigures. Of Tonto (above) I wrote "From my perspective, every part of him, from his printed legs, front and back-printed torso and head with it’s alternate expression, is outstanding, with the highlight being his amazing hair and head dress, topped off with a black bird.". Those words still ring true nearly a year later. I'm therefore delighted to hand Tonto the gong for best minifigure this year; while other Lone Ranger minifigures such Red Harrington also deserve praise, Tonto wins by a head.

Honourable Mention : Gingerbread Man. How do they do it ? Honestly, notwithstanding my critical comments above about LEGO's unpopular and divisive Mr. Gold stunt, you do have to hand it to them - after 11 full series of Collectible Minifigures (CMFs) they still seem to be able to come up with the goods. The Gingerbread Man was my pick of Series 11, and indeed one of my favourites since LEGO started pumping out the CMFs. I can't wait to see what's in store in Series 12 and beyond....

Other contenders : Legends of Chima (overall mini figure quality across the theme)


7. The "Better than Expected" Award

Last year's winner : Lord of the Rings

2013 winner : The Lone Ranger theme

Given my comments about the Lone Ranger theme in a couple of the previous award categories, I guess you probably saw this one coming.... When I learned that LEGO would be producing sets based on the 2013 Lone Ranger movie I wasn't particularly fussed, figuring that I'd almost certainly pass on them. I never watched the Lone Ranger TV series as a kid, I had little to no interest in the movie, and I half expected some uninspiring and over-priced movie tie-ins which would sink without trace. As previously stated, however, what we actually got were some genuinely excellent sets, both in terms of the set design and the minifigures. As previously stated, a couple of the sets were among the strongest licensed sets of the year in my opinion. Early discounting of the sets at retail suggests that sales weren't strong, unfortunately, probably as a result of the movie's failure at the box office. The team that designed the sets will almost certainly never read this, but I nevertheless hope that they're aware what a good job they did, and that future licenses are as thoughtfully handled.


8. Most Welcome LEGO-Related Announcement

Last year's winner : Watford LEGO Brand Store

2013 Winner : Peter Reid's Exo Suit to be the next Cuusoo Set


Having given my "Most Welcome Announcement" gong to something with personal significance last year, I'm afraid I'm going to have to do exactly the same thing this year as well..... Exo Suit designer Pete Reid (Legoloverman) is a friend and a fellow Brickish Association member, and I was absolutely delighted when his Exo Suit design garnered 10,000 votes on Cuusoo and was subsequently greenlit by LEGO to go into production. Finally a Cuusoo release that I'm genuinely excited about, and let's hope that LEGO do the final model justice.... Well done, Pete !

Honourable mention : December 2013 update of Cuusoo guidelines. And not before time.... Cuusoo gives LEGO fans the opportunity to upload their original designs and get those designs made into official LEGO sets, providing of course that those designs prove to be sufficiently popular and meet certain criteria. It's grown in leaps and bounds since its inception in 2008, but that growth in popularity has made it increasingly difficult to wade through all the derivative, me-too designs and obscure, limited-interest proposals clogging up the site. A few weeks back Cuusoo updated its Guidelines, House Rules, and Terms of Service, however, and I was pleased to note that the updates will help to address some of the problems. Non brick-built construction projects are now explicitly out of scope, so no more apps, branded items or other tat, and also out of scope are all the interminable battlepack-type projects, uber niche-interest company or team logos, and projects that don't use authentic LEGO parts. All we need now is a way of limiting the thousands of derivative ideas based on licensed properties, particularly those featuring I.P.s where LEGO have already rejected previous proposals, and maybe a few more 'hidden gems' might be uncovered. We can hope....


9. Gimme LEGO Reader's Choice Award

Last year's winner : Set 10228 Haunted House

2013 winner : over to you....

Yep - this is your chance to have your say. I've come up with a list of what I consider to be twelve of the best sets of 2012. Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to choose your favourite from the list on the top right of the page. If your pick of the year isn't on the list then click 'None of the above' and leave a comment or send me a message via the contact button above the list letting me know which set you think should top the pile. Cast your votes - one person, one vote - and at midnight on 16th January the poll will close and we'll have our winner.... If you're on a smartphone or similar and can't see the poll then click "view web version" at the bottom of the page in order to see the nominations and cast your vote.

*Update* Voting has now closed. Click here to see the results !


Previous Gimme LEGO Awards : 2012, 2011